Wikipedia is a great source of info about computer games and 80’s sit-coms. Anything political is so biased left-ward as to be farcical rather than factual. Case in point, the Edwards imbroglio.
This discussion in Wikipedia is just a microcosm of how leftists control Wikipedia:
Worth noting that the London based Times is now running a full article on the story. [2] Joshdboz (talk) 21:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Why don’t we just call a spade a spade here: leftists control wikipedia, long ago they snarked up the Admin and Moderator positions and assiduously protect liberal figures and allow all kinds of fables and half-truths be posted about conservatives. The Douglas Feith article is a prime example. They allow liberal blog and liberal newsletters for references, who admittedly use anonymous sources, yet they are steadfast in protecting John Edwards.
This is all ridiculous, he was there, the facts are going to leak out. The point is, the leftist powers that be fight these turf battles to prove their power. They keep out legitimate facts, which someone who wants encyclopedic summary of are denied because the leftist admins want to keep their personal private wikipedia as leftist as possible for as long as possible. I seriously doubt they will allow the facts in this case to be posted no matter how they are confirmed.
The sarcastic, condescending attitude of these straw bosses is really asinine. They think they own the place, and I guess they aren’t wrong. The facts have been scrubbed and the article is locked so no one can alter their view of reality. Nice going, reality based community. They also ban and block any comments about their fascist behaviour, so this will be gone in no time. And cram the “please sign your posts” the bot does it, what’s the big deal. Its just more of their power-mad bullying.
That pretty well sums it up. As another co-blogger here at docweaselblog covered the asininity of wiki editors before, but there is also the fact that leftists are in firm control there and every article that even tangentially covers politics is suspect at best, and probably worthless in presenting a fair and factual picture.
It was only predictable. As shown in countless comment threads and internet polls, leftists are obsessive to the point of dementia and other deviant mental problems about controlling any content they can on the ‘net, as if it makes some sort of difference. They click the lightswitches five times when they leave the room and they post 5 comments saying FUCK BUSH in every thread, etc.
High profile bloggers like the guy at MyDD advocating googlebombing is an example of how this obsessive manipulation is encouraged by the most visible and popular liberals and leftists on the ‘net. I’m sure any political article is policed regularly by a contingent of KosKids who grabbed up Admin posts at wiki early and keep the site reliably leftist.
Its good these things get out and publicized so that no one will mistake wikipedia as a fair and factual source.
08.05.08 at 21:39:59
John Edwards: Worthless…
via docweasel blog: Warning; nudity.Tags: doc weasel, John Edwards, Corrupt Democrats ……